The pain versus the gain : A qualitative study on the proposed IFRS for SMEs whether it would be suitable for companies in Sweden

1194 visningar
uppladdat: 2008-01-01
Inactive member

Inactive member

Nedanstående innehåll är skapat av Mimers Brunns besökare. Kommentera arbete
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) are potentially the most dynamic sector of the economy and their growth is considered to be key for the overall economic well-being. Micro, small and medium-sized enterprises are socially and economically important, since they represent 99 % of all enterprises in the EU and provide around 65 million jobs and contribute to entrepreneurship and innovation. Small firms are also economically significant in all countries. It was estimated in 1997 that, there were approximately 6.3 million small or medium-sized entities or SMEs in the USA.In Europe, where there are over 20 million business enterprises, more than 5 million private entities (generally referred to as small and medium-sized entities, or SMEs) have a statutory audit and reporting obligation. Virtually every European country has developed its own simplified national GAAP for private entities, some countries have two or even three levels of GAAP for private entities. The same is true in Asia and elsewhere across the globe.On February 15, 2007, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued the exposure draft (ED) of its International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) for Small and Medium-Sized Entities (SME) for public comment . The aim of the proposed standard is to provide a simplified, self-contained set of accounting principles derived from the full IFRS to be used by smaller and non-listed companies.Acknowledging the need for different accounting regulation for SMEs, in December 1998, The Swedish Accounting Standards Board ( Bokföringsnämnden or BFN ) decided to write its own accounting rules so called “K Project” for unlisted entities that would contain its recommendations of accounting regulations for a company in Sweden.IASB claims that at the present time there are well over 50 jurisdictions around the world where the full IFRS is required or permitted, for all or most limited liability companies, including the micros. IASB further states that if the full IFRS has been deemed suitable for all entities, then the proposed IFRS for SMEs will also be suitable. Or is it!Based on IASB’s statement, which leads to a very interesting but yet simple research question, which is:“Would the proposed IFRS for SMEs be suitable for companies in Sweden”?Financial statements are a final result of various accounting treatments that are contained in the accounting standards. Good ac...

...läs fortsättningen genom att logga in dig.

Medlemskap krävs

För att komma åt allt innehåll på Mimers Brunn måste du vara medlem och inloggad.
Kontot skapar du endast via facebook.

Källor för arbetet

Saknas

Kommentera arbetet: The pain versus the gain : A qualitative study on the proposed IFRS for SMEs whether it would be suitable for companies in Sweden

 
Tack för din kommentar! Ladda om sidan för att se den. ×
Det verkar som att du glömde skriva något ×
Du måste vara inloggad för att kunna kommentera. ×
Något verkar ha gått fel med din kommentar, försök igen! ×

Kommentarer på arbetet

Inga kommentarer än :(

Källhänvisning

Inactive member [2008-01-01]   The pain versus the gain : A qualitative study on the proposed IFRS for SMEs whether it would be suitable for companies in Sweden
Mimers Brunn [Online]. https://mimersbrunn.se/article?id=16423 [2024-05-14]

Rapportera det här arbetet

Är det något du ogillar med arbetet? Rapportera
Vad är problemet?



Mimers Brunns personal granskar flaggade arbeten kontinuerligt för att upptäcka om något strider mot riktlinjerna för webbplatsen. Arbeten som inte följer riktlinjerna tas bort och upprepade överträdelser kan leda till att användarens konto avslutas.
Din rapportering har mottagits, tack så mycket. ×
Du måste vara inloggad för att kunna rapportera arbeten. ×
Något verkar ha gått fel med din rapportering, försök igen. ×
Det verkar som om du har glömt något att specificera ×
Du har redan rapporterat det här arbetet. Vi gör vårt bästa för att så snabbt som möjligt granska arbetet. ×