Det dialogiska klassrummet : En studie om lärares olika undervisningsmetoder

Nedanstående innehåll är skapat av Mimers Brunns besökare. Kommentera arbete

AbstractTheoryWhich education model has the ultimate learning potential? According to Olga Dysthe a varied education predominated by a dialogical nature is the best way of teaching.PurposeMy main purpose in this essay has been to investigate three different ways of education models and decide, on the basis of Dysthes’ model, whether they can be classified as a monological or a dialogical model.I have also investigated if the thesis of Dysthes, “The teachers view of knowledge determines the choice of teaching method”, is anchored in the reality.Furthermore, I have surveyed how the teachers educate concerning democracy. For example, on the basis of certain rules, are all sudents able to make the selves heard in a classroom that is characterized as dialogical? In such a classroom the teacher works whith activities to involve everyone and according to Dysthe, democracy is an attitude rather than a political system. Democracy is necessary in a classroom that is classified as dialogical.ResultThe essay is exclusively qualitative and builds upon interviews with three teachers on different upper secondary social schools witin the Gothenburg area.My results indicate that the teathers way of educating totaly differs from each others and that the thesis of Dysthe can be applied on only two out of three cases. Only one of the three teathers includes the dialogue to its full extent. This teacher is the only one to apply democracy in i...