The Holy Grail, a woman or a coup?

The Holy Grail, a woman or a coup?

The date of 23 mars 2003 changed the world vision about the Holy Grail. When Dan Brown's book "The  Da Vinci code" came out in the shops,  everyone was shocked. Could this really be true?

The visions in the book had been presented before. In the book "The holy blood and the holy grail" was published 1982. The author had the same vision about the Holy Grail as Dan Brown in the "Da Vinci Code".

People often don't know about the other book because it didn't have that success as Dan Browns book had in the beginning and still has.

The question here is, isn't Dan Brown copying the other book if it is the same vision? And why did only Dan brown's book get more success?

The easiest answer on this question would be that Dan Brown writes in the book before the first chapter that "this you now will read is not something I came up with, it is based on reality. Everything that is written here is true."

This makes the book even more interesting. You almost believe the vision even if you understand that it is a book that the story is artifice. But you know that the fact is true, and that is something that gives you an adrenaline kick. You start to think, and maybe you see the world in a different way and the people in it? He says that it is true and that makes the big difference. Suddenly everything in the book becomes so real. You believe everything that stands, and it seems so true. You just want to believe in it because it is so extraordinary. It is a book you never had read before and you never will read something similar again

But of course could it also be so that Dan Brown is a better author than Michael Baigent. That the story about Robert Langdon, this American professor is much better than the fact book that The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail. It is obvious if you see the stats of reader between "The Da Vinci Code" and "The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail" that people likes this vision, but they don't want a lot of facts about it. They want action stories that has a hero, who discover the history and makes people feel good. Because it is what this book really does, it makes you feel good.

That you are a part of something that is bigger than yourself. 

For hundred of years it has been obvious that the Holy Grail is an item in the Christianity. It was the coup that Jesus drank wine of on the last supper, and later someone else took the last blood from Jesus, when he was crucified, and collected the blood in the coup. It became a holy item. It was no longer an ordinary coup. It became a coup with the ability to reveal the most wonderful feelings and things you had never seen before. Everyone desired it because it could bring peace to a land with war. It could feed everyone in the whole wide world. It could give so much joy to people.

But only a person whit a true blooded heart and a pure soul could find it. This is a myth that you read in the story of king Arthur and the knights around the round table, about Camelot, Guinevere, Sir Lancelot and a kingdom that have peace. Just because Arthur had a knight that had a true blooded heart, a pure soul, that was the knight sir Galadian. He is young and bold. So he finds the grail and he hold it up and the grail is glowing. It had found a place that deserved it.

This is the most famous tale about the Holy Grail. You could find many else, but just this one had everyone heard about before. Even if it just was a whisper from your mother when you was sleeping as a child.

So back to Dan Brown's theory. In his book he represents the Holy Grail as a blood line. The holy blood line reveals that Jesus where a father. The holy blood line is his family three below him.

"The key to heaven."

He and Maria Magdalena got a child, a girl that she named Sara after that Jesus had been crucified.

We don't now if Jesus did know that Maria Magdalena was whit child, his child, before he died.

We just know that Maria Magdalena wasn't a slut which is written in the bible, the one slut that Jesus couldn't help. She was doomed to hell as it is written in the bible. That in this theory is not true. It is just a way of the church to convince people that Maria Magdalena was not a girl to count on. 

She was Jesus wife. It is an insult to her that been called a slut, the bible don't want to see her as Jesus wife. She is the one that makes Jesus human. She is the one that takes down the holiness about Jesus. Jesus wasn't a virgin, he had sin with Maria Magdalena. If you could call it a sin when the actually where married. But he wasn't this man that didn't think ore did something wrong if you follow the bible. He's Gloria was gone.

This is not something the church would appreciate. It exists a secret sect that is called Opus Dei.

In public they are just someone who take cares of the Vatican state dirty work.

But if you read the Da Vinci Code and believe it, they are a sect and their job is to make sure that people never finds out that Jesus had a wife and child. They didn't want to make Jesus a human.

He most be the holy son of a God that had special powers, to make blind people see, to give food to everyone that needs and cross a sea and stand on water.

In the book it is one man particular that catches your mind.

Aringarosa, a Spanish bishop, is the one that is very believing and takes the Opus Dei and the secret most seriously. He want to get rid off this man (Robert Langdon) that is about to reveal the secret that just have been now of Priory of Sion before.

Robert is getting very close to the answer and Aringarosa wants to do everything to stop him. So he sends away this albino guy, his angel. That believes that God saved him when he was a child so he does everything that his masters say. Even if he knows that killing is a sin.

Priory of Sion is an old sect that is derives from the knights templar.

There's job is to protect the blood line. It started after Jesus death. Maria gave birth to a child, a girl that she named Sara, the knights wanted to protect them because they knew that Jesus guys and the state of Jerusalem wanted to see them dead.

So they took Maria Magdalena and Sara to France. There Maria lived on a manor her hole life. They did lay out clues that the head character in the book, Langdon is following. Like the painting, the last suffer that Leonardo Da Vinci painted 1498. It reveals, that if you move the boy without a beard to the left of Jesus and put him on the right of Jesus, next to his shoulder they fit perfectly together and they form a V that is up side down. That is the mark for man. It represents the dick on a man, aggressive, and this mark isused of the military even today. The brooch they have is an upside down V.

And an ordinary V makes the mark for a woman. It is the same mark that you form to a coup when you are painting. .

That is the explanation that is given in the book, why people talkes about a coup when it is a woman. The coup represents a woman's matrix.

In this case, Maria Magdalena's matrix that gave birth to Jesus child.

Prierie The Sion then developed to be a sect that worshipped the woman. They worshipped Venus that represents the woman in the Roman mythology.

The big question with this myth or truth is that it says that when the millennium came the heir of the bloodline would reveal her or him self.

This is something that people says is the explanation that this myth is fake. If it would be true where is the heir? Or did the Opus Dei a long time ago succeed with their job and kill the heirs of Jesus?

This is a question that has awaken many thoughts.

- How can he know that it is true?

- Does Prierie The Sion really exist?

- Isn't Prierie The Sion a sect which Leonardo Da Vinci and Isaac Newton was member of just because they worshipped Venus. Not that they protected "The Holy Grail"? Even if everyone knows that the sect has one secret that they never revealed.

- That the Opus Dei exist is well known, but they have never done something wrong against the bible like killing someone.

The church also has a point in this question. The vatikan state think it makes the church look bad and nonsense like this wouldn't be a loud to publish.

This is something that shock people that believes on the bible. They don't want to hear that there Gods son wasn't Gods son. He was an ordinary boy, son to a carpenter and gave birth to one child.

They want to see him as this holy man. That gave people everything they needed except bring people back from the dead.

My opinion is that Dan Browns theory is really interesting.

Even if I am a person that believes in God, but I don't believe, I did believe like this even before the book came out, that he had a son that have walked this earth. I can believe that Jesus was like Mohammed. A man that teaches and care about other people. That he was a prophet. Not that he was God's son and could stand on water and make blind people see. That is just myths.

I have read the book and it is really good.

Some things I believe is made up in the book but many things make that you really think about it, and when the movie came out it was clear. This is something you want to believe in. Just because you believe that Jesus was a ordinary man with a wife it doesn't mean that you don't believe in God. Because the holy blood line just shows that Jesus got specials powers from God.

Like Sophie does in the movie, she takes away Langdon's fear. And that was something her mom could also ...