Brutna vallöften - vad är acceptabelt? En studie av moderaterna och kristdemokraterna innan och efter valet år 2006

Nedanstående innehåll är skapat av Mimers Brunns besökare. Kommentera arbete

This paper begins to observe two non-socialist parties in Sweden, Kristdemokraterna and Moderaterna, before and after they won an election. The two parties formed an alliance with other parties and manifested a political program. The main focus lies on their campaign promises and their premier political area as a single party before the election and what results that has been produced a year after. The method is a comparative analysis between the two campaign programs and the result, parliamentary decision etc. The largest party Moderaterna has completed or started on their main political issue, but Kristdemokraternas development has not been that successful. In the next section of the paper a theoretical discussion will therefore take place and examine different political ethical theories concerning broken campaign promises. Different perspectives on what is acceptable behaviour for a party in the political sphere and what obligations a party has towards its voters is the main topic. No concise conclusion will take place; however a presentation of various theories is the main target and access to new angels of political ethnics. The last section of ...